by Saloumeh Gholami
See KN2 [QID: DKN0a]
See KN2 [QID: DKN0a]
It is difficult to say. Please see my comment on § 2 in KN [QID: DKN0a]
Difficult to say.
It is unclear.
It is unclear.
Actually difficult to say, but probably since the immigration of the Turkic-speaking tribes in Anatolia. There is a theory, that that the appearance of Zazas in the areas where they live today seems to have been connected with waves of migration of Zazas from the highlands of Gīlān province in Iran (Deylam) during the 10th-12th centuries, as mentioned by Asatrian (1995). However, there is no extra-linguistic data on a possible migration of the Zazakî speakers. Whether and when they migrated from where or not is very hypothetical, which a) is based on morphosyntactic correlations between Zazakî and some languages of the Caspian Sea and b) erroneously goes back to the fact that the tribal names Dimilî and Daylam are the same (a basically refuted fallacy, which dates from the beginning of the 20th century). If the Zaza or language originated in the Daylam region, the split is likely at least a millennium ago, if not older.
Difficult to say.
See KN 2 [QID: DKN0a]
See KN 2 [QID: DKN0a]
See KN 2 [QID: DKN0a]
See KN 2 [QID: DKN0a]
See KN2 [QID: DKN0a]
See KN2 [QID: DKN0a]
Domain | Question | Value | Comment |
---|---|---|---|